Talk:What Would You Do? (season 16)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Heartfox (talk · contribs) 22:18, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Review forthcoming. Heartfox (talk) 22:18, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
said to have been inspired
reword.Because of this, no face-covering mandates or social distancing were present in the season.
not in source.- suggest retitling "reception" section to just "ratings" as there's only one section with info.
- suggest increased use of secondary sources (renewal dates, appearances, etc.) instead of relying on press releases/sources that use 90% use of press releases.
Apart from ratings sources which are not "significant coverage", almost every source is not independent of the subject. At this point, I honestly don't even think this article meets WP:GNG. Unfortunately, this article does not meet GA at this time in my view. Heartfox (talk) 22:35, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.