Talk:What Would You Do? (season 16)

What Would You Do? (season 16) was nominated as a Media and drama good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (October 8, 2020). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Season 17

Source 1, Source 2, Source 3 Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:59, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:What Would You Do? (season 16)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Heartfox (talk · contribs) 22:18, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Review forthcoming. Heartfox (talk) 22:18, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

said to have been inspired reword.
Because of this, no face-covering mandates or social distancing were present in the season. not in source.
suggest retitling "reception" section to just "ratings" as there's only one section with info.
suggest increased use of secondary sources (renewal dates, appearances, etc.) instead of relying on press releases/sources that use 90% use of press releases.

Apart from ratings sources which are not "significant coverage", almost every source is not independent of the subject. At this point, I honestly don't even think this article meets WP:GNG. Unfortunately, this article does not meet GA at this time in my view. Heartfox (talk) 22:35, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.