Talk:What Lies Ahead/GA1
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Lampman (talk · contribs) 11:36, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
This seems like a perfectly good article – comprehensive and well-referenced. I've tried to make some improvements to the language here and there, please make sure you're ok with these. Just a couple of things I would like to see addressed:
- The article uses the term "walker" several times, without ever explaining what they are. The word "zombie" is in fact not used once, except for in a review quote. As far as I'm aware, the term "walker" is part of the internal lingo of the "Walking Dead" universe, but it's important that the article is equally accessible to the uninitiated and fans alike.
Done —DAP388 (talk) 21:33, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- "in its respective timeslot" – I'm not quite sure what is meant by "respective" here, shouldn't it just be "in its timeslot"?
- Done —DAP388 (talk) 21:33, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Will check back soon, should be a quick fix. Lampman (talk) 13:29, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry if I didn't make myself clear, I didn't mean that all references to "walkers" should be changed to "zombies". I simply meant that the term had to be explained. Also I'm not quite sure why "Christ" was changed to "Jesus of Nazareth", which is a less common appellation. I made some changes, see if you're happy with it. Lampman (talk) 20:39, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, that's what you meant? My apologies. It all looks good. —DAP388 (talk) 00:21, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
- Great, promoted! Lampman (talk) 08:40, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
- It seems that at some point the definition of walker was deleted from the article. I've remedied it in the lead along with a comment to alert other editors to this discussion. - Reidgreg (talk) 16:13, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Great, promoted! Lampman (talk) 08:40, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, that's what you meant? My apologies. It all looks good. —DAP388 (talk) 00:21, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.