Talk:What Is... Cliff Clavin?/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 23:27, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Infobox
[edit]- No issues
Lead
[edit]- No issues
Preface
[edit]- An explanation of Jeopardy! is not necessary as separate article explains how it is played
- Only include information that relates to this episode
- Must people be forced to go to Jeopardy! article? The preface serves as a purpose for readers who do not have to read more about Jeopardy! --George Ho (talk) 00:42, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Plot
[edit]- No issues
Reception
[edit]- Combine all information in one paragraph, as it all relates to each other
Done. --George Ho (talk) 00:50, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Impact
[edit]- No issues
Notes
[edit]- References 1, 2 → Cite source in a "Bibliography section"
- Done --George Ho (talk) 00:50, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
- Reference 5 → Publisher of "Chicago Tribune" needed.
- It becomes #4 after replacing #3 with #2. Why needing Publisher? I tried finding one, but found author and no publisher. --George Ho (talk) 00:50, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
- Reference 10 → "Google Books" should not be italicized
- FN 10 becomes FN 9. I don't know why "Google" must not be italicized, but it is not formatted any way. --George Ho (talk) 00:50, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
- Reference 12 → Publisher is needed
- FN 12 becomes 11. Why needing Publisher? I could not find one publisher. --George Ho (talk) 00:50, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
- Reference 13 → "InfoWorld" should not be italicized
- Why not? It's a website. Also, it is italicized automatically with template. --George Ho (talk) 00:50, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
- Reference 14 → Full web citation needed
- Done --George Ho (talk) 00:50, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
External links
[edit]- "Fun trivia question on this website" should not be included in this section
- Done --George Ho (talk) 00:51, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Conclusion
[edit]After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put the article on hold at this time. I will give you the general seven days to fix these mistakes and/or address other issues which you believe do not concern good article status. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 (talk2me) 23:48, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
- Since all of the issues have been addressed, I feel confident passing this article. Congratulations and keep up the good work! Rp0211 (talk2me) 03:30, 26 June 2012 (UTC)