Talk:What's Love Got to Do with It (song)

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Help! (song)#Cover versions|Help!]] The anchor (#Cover versions) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Already written in 1976?

That's what the Real Book III says: (c) 1976 Good Single Limited & Myaxe Ltd. c/o Irving Music Inc. Rondor Music (London) Ltd., 10A Parsons Green, London SW6 (50%)/Warner-Chappell Music Ltd., 129 Park St., London W1 (50%). Used by Permission of CPP/Belwin, Inc. Miami, FL, and Music Sales Ltd. All rights reserved. ... Interesting! -andy 80.129.120.31 19:21, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Tina turner-whats love got to do with it s.jpg

Image:Tina turner-whats love got to do with it s.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 15:51, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Original (?) version

Just put in a piece about a version recorded by Bucks Fizz. This was in Feb 84, not sure if this was before Turner recorded it, but they must have been close. Does anyone know when she recorded it?--Tuzapicabit (talk) 02:43, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Synthesizer solo

I am hoping that one of the authors of this article is actually close to the production of the hit song. I think the article deserves a section on the production of the song. I'm pretty sure, but don't know how to verify, that the synthesizer solo uses a sample of Tina's voice and this would be a notably early example of this technique. justcary (talk) 05:25, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's actually a Yamaha DX7 patch - the rest of the track has a lot of DX7. There's a sample of the original here (search for "harmonica"). -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 14:38, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Back when this song was popular I have a fuzzy memory of hearing on one of the popular countdown shows that the song was originally written with Mick Jagger in mind, or that Jagger turned it down or that after hearing the song Turner begged for the song and got it before it was offered to Jagger. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.249.246.183 (talk) 13:35, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An excellent article on the song's recording appeared in Sound on Sound in 2004 (as part of the magazine's "Classic Tracks" series)—and can be found on-line. It'd be an ideal source for a production section. Pololei (talk) 17:08, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Black and white video

There is a black and white video of this song, how come there isn't a mention of it? ^[1] Jking88 (talk) 15:38, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pu8KFlfzk3Y

Songwriting credits?

With such an extensive history you would think there would be some mention of the songwrier(s). And maybe how the song was originally conceived - if there was a backstory.

Rantedia (talk)

Music video director

I don't think any of the Mark Robinsons on the disambiguation page refer to the director of the music video for this song. The Mark Robinson related to this article has a LinkedIn profile and an entry on [1] that lists his music videos. Some of the songs are pretty famous so it would probably good if there was a Wikipedia article on him. Mikenlesley (talk) 08:55, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New Wave

The infobox currently categorizes this song as new wave. Now I know that's a notoriously ill defined genre, but is anybody seriously going to argue that WLGTDWI is a new wave single? You might as well claim that Walking In The Air is new wave. Sheesh. --Ef80 (talk) 22:20, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dropped waivers.

Dropped waivers.Posted from Abel Obile Omale as developer director staff.

[1] ttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pu8KFlfzk3Y

[1]

Categories