Talk:West Dean, West Sussex
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on West Dean, West Sussex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110608075926/http://www.westsussex.gov.uk/communityandliving/census2001/pop_parish_summary.pdf to http://www.westsussex.gov.uk/communityandliving/census2001/pop_parish_summary.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:58, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Commons link
[edit]This doesn't work as there is no Commons category for West Dean, West Sussex. SV, you know I am a dummy at such things and would make a mess of it, so could you fix it if you have a moment? Thanks, Tony. Tony Holkham (Talk) 21:24, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
- I do not usually do the link the inline way, so have redone it my usual way and it seems to get to the intended cat with lots in it.SovalValtos (talk) 22:55, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
- SV - That is amazing - thank you. Tony Holkham (Talk) 23:03, 24 June 2019 (UTC)