This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malaysia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malaysia and Malaysia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MalaysiaWikipedia:WikiProject MalaysiaTemplate:WikiProject MalaysiaMalaysia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
weiling-gallery.com is a wp:Primary source and is not considered a wp:reliable source. e.g. ...is a prominent art gallery in Malaysia is sourced by weiling-gallery.com They call themselves "prominent"? Rather self-serving?
Does the article meet wp:GNG? Much content is sourced by weiling-gallery.com
You might peruse some of the art gallery articles in the USA for some examples. Not all are guaranteed to be written according to policy. The way the article is written at the moment archive link is closer to how it should read than before.. (Encyclopedic, dry, boring...) Needs many primary / weiling-gallery.com links replaced with secondary links. Primary/self-serving citations are higher priority than something like the Philanthropy and corporate collaboration section. Section headers should use sentence case: MOS:HEADINGS. The citation for the CORUM bowls does not indicate where they came from nor that the gallery worked with CORUM. Example: The source could written the same if the bowls were found in a trash dump. It would be better if there was a link to a news site about this and the other collaborations. I would recommend asking at the wp:Teahouse. You should get more accurate answers than my babblings here! Cheers Adakiko (talk) 17:44, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]