Talk:Weed (manga)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: SCB '92 (talk • contribs • count) 19:34, 10 September 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- well half the legacy section is uncited, where you're telling a plot of the sequel; but it is optional to cite a plot as it is referencing the work itself, so...
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- no problems here
- C. No original research:
- no problems here
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- no problems here
- B. Focused:
- no problems here
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- no problems here
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- no problems here
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- no problems here
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- when listing the cast members in the caption, I'd put "and" before "Rocket"
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- this deserves to be a good article; good job
- Pass or Fail: