Jump to content

Talk:Webster's Brewery

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleWebster's Brewery has been listed as one of the Agriculture, food and drink good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 9, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
September 9, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
November 20, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
December 3, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
April 8, 2012Good article nomineeListed
April 15, 2012Good article reassessmentListed
Current status: Good article

Improvements

[edit]

This article was written in a very emotive manner, was entirely unsourced and was badly written. I've done my best to tidy things up and improve it,and this is still a work in progress. Can't find evidence for the Guinness bottling claim --Farrtj (talk) 05:31, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel Webster

[edit]

If you type "Samuel Webster" in it takes you somewhere else. I want it to redirect to here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Farrtj (talk • contribs) 10:13, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The name is used in another article, so I have created a disambiguation page - Samuel Webster - which shows readers the possibilities and allows them to make the choice as to which article they are looking for. SilkTork *YES! 11:35, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dearth of information

[edit]

What I really need is raw information and data about this brewery. I've scoured the internet and I've literally included everything of note. What is needed really is for someone to look at the archives in Leeds, or to consult books on brewing history. Farrtj (talk) 14:15, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article nomination

[edit]

Are you sure you want to renominate this ? The points from the last review have still not been rectified. As it stands its a quick fail. Jim Sweeney (talk) 18:03, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is not clear to me what is wrong. Farrtj (talk) 18:35, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Webster's Brewery/GA3. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Chip123456 (talk · contribs) 10:22, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am quite impressed with the number of references present in the article, and how most points are backed up.--Chip123456 (talk) 10:31, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well written, stays on topic. Images show correct, valid captions. Very clear, easy to read.

The on hold was NOT for this article.

Obviously, a lot of effort has been put in to this article since the last inspection

GA Reassessment

[edit]
This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Webster's Brewery/GA4. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Notes:

Lead

Perhaps their most famous advertising slogan was 'Drives out the northern thirst'. - Original research, why was it the most popular?

Need citations in infobox, number of employees unsourced needs a direct citation, Union Cross Yard, Halifax needs a link possibly.

Origins: 1838–1900

"The site was chosen for its Pennine spring" is better as "The site was chosen as it was next to the Pennine springs" because Pennines are a mountain range. Halifax is within The Pennines.

Commas not consistent. For example, it says "In 1860 he was joined in partnership by his three sons" then later in the same section "In 1873, increasing demand led the company" Makes the article harder to read.

Cigars could be linked maybe? Examples of any wines they sold? Okay with cigars, no examples of wine available.

"with £175,000 (£17.5 million in 2010) of capital" What is capital? Can you wiki link it?

"In 1892 net profit was £20,000 (£2 million)" - Clarify? Why is it the same currency? Is it because it was a different year?

I don't know what you mean here.Farrtj (talk) 17:47, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It says that it is £20,000, but why does it say £2 million in brackets afterwards? It is confusing and so needs to be clarified. Puffin Let's talk! 17:58, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

When reviewing it I understood what the above meant. Although as said it could be explained a tiny bit more, but it's nothing majorly wrong. --Chip123456 (talk) 18:59, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"leaving an estate of £87,454 (£9 million)." What type of estate? Estate car? Housing estate? It needs a wiki link.

"In 1900 the Maltings building was built" What's a Maltings building? Needs a wiki link.

Many things need commas in the Origins: 1838–1900 section, in some sections it is a mouthful to read.

20th-century consolidation

Again, inconsistent commas: "In 1919 net profit was reported at £22,325 (£900,000 at 2010 prices)" and then "In 1929, the company's entire stock of properties, land and"

"(£23.2 million in 2010)" "(£65 million in 2010 prices)" Why 2010? Already outdated. There shouldn't be things in the article which become outdated like this.

You expect me to come along every year to update the Bank of England Inflation calculator data? Chances are its value in 2010 isn't meaningfully different than its value in 2011. Besides, it's only a rough guess anyway, which is sufficient for this article's purposes.Farrtj (talk) 17:51, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"which could trace its origins back to 1790" Why? How?

That information would belong to a WIkipedia page for that specific brewery. This page is about Webster's, I don't want to digress.Farrtj (talk) 17:51, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"In 1957 Webster's took over John Ainley & Sons of Huddersfield and Woodhead Brothers of Elland, near Halifax, a mineral water manufacturer" flows better as "In 1957, Webster's took over John Ainley & Sons of Huddersfield and Woodhead Brothers of Elland, located near Halifax. This company was a mineral water manufacturer."

"By 1958 the Northgate offices were proving insufficient for the expanding company" Insufficient what? Please clarify.

"The maltings was closed" What's maltings? Needs a wiki link maybe or clarification within the article.

"6000 quarters (8000 kilograms)" Need to use Template:Convert for things like this.

"a reciprocal trading agreement" What type of reciprocal? Needs a wiki link.

Self explanatory.Farrtj (talk) 18:39, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"In 1966 a friendly takeover of the Bradford brewers J. Hey & Company Limited added 73 public houses to their estate." Why was it friendly, too vague.

Wikilinked friendly takeover earlier in the article. Otherwise self explanatory.Farrtj (talk) 18:39, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Webster's was valued at £3.3 million, and J. Hey valued at £1 million." By who?

"Throughout the 1960s and early 70s consolidation," Inconsistent date format.

"The takeover was a friendly one" Why?

Explained in the same sentence that it was agreed upon by the Webster's family.Farrtj (talk) 18:46, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"was a great boon" What's a boon? Maybe needs a wiki link.

"That same year, Watney Mann itself was taken over by Grand Metropolitan." Unsourced, needs a direct citation.

"described as "wonderfully traditional"" By who?

Closure

"The brewery's bottling line was closed in 1991 with the loss of 54 jobs." Implies that because 54 jobs were lost, it closed. Better as "The brewery's bottling line was closed in 1991, which caused the loss of 54 jobs."

"at "well below"" Who said that? What does it mean? Does it mean well below average? Please clarify.

" deemed "unsustainable"" By who?

Brands

List could be turned into prose, lists are discouraged for GA articles.

"is a light mild that was launched " Light mild what? Please clarify.

Advertising

"a number of memorable advertising campaigns" How many? Why is it memorable?

"replaced by animatronic puppets during the 1990s" Why?

I don't know why. I'm just saying that's what happened.Farrtj (talk) 19:07, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Words to watch

"Its two most famous brands" Famous, peacock term.

"Perhaps their most famous advertising" Famous, peacock term.

"more popular John Smith's ale brand" Popular, peacock term.

"most popular off trade" Popular, peacock term.

"the less popular Webster's" Popular, peacock term.

"was important to the company," Important, peacock term.

"Many breweries went public" How many? Too vague.

"a number of memorable advertising campaigns" How many? Too vague.

References

FN 1 + FN 2 + FN 6 + FN 18 - Same reference, need to name the reference to prevent reference duplication.

FN 3 - Need to use {{cite web}} and provide the author, publisher, publishing date and access date.

FN 4 - Need author, publishing date and page number.

FN 5 - Needs publishing date and you need to use {{cite book}}.

FN 7 - Should be named the same as FN 3 to prevent reference duplication.

FN 8 - Why is it in capital letters?

FN 9 - What is this? Is it a journal? If so, use {{cite journal}}. You need to provide page numbers.

FN 10 - This is a blog, it is not a reliable source. You need to use {{cite web}} anyway, but the reference should be changed.

It is the blog of a noted beer historian, therefore it is reliable.Farrtj (talk) 18:23, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FN 11 + FN 44 + FN 47 + FN 60 + FN 63 - This is a website, so you need to use {{cite web}} and provide the author, publisher, publishing date and access date.

FN 12 - What is this? Is it a journal? If so, use {{cite journal}}. You need to provide page numbers.

FN 13 - Needs page number. It is a book so you should use {{cite book}}.

FN 14 + FN 16 + FN 17 + FN 19 + FN 68 + FN 69 + FN 77 - Need to use {{cite web}} and provide the author, publisher, publishing date and access date.

FN 20 + FN 21 - News references, need to use {{cite news}}.

FN 22 - Same as FN 16, need to name them the same to prevent reference duplication.

FN 23 + FN 53 + FN 65 + FN 66 - Is there a web article?

FN 24 + FN 25 + FN 26 + FN 27 + FN 28 + FN 29 + FN 30 + FN 31 + FN 39 + FN 40 + FN 45 + FN 54 + FN 56 + FN 57 + FN 58 - News references, need to use {{cite news}}.

FN 32 + FN 33 + FN 37 + FN 48 + FN 70 + FN 78 - Need author, publishing date and page number. Use {{cite book}}.

FN 35 + FN 79 + FN 82 - Web references, use {{cite web}} provide the author, publisher, publishing date and access date.

FN 41 + FN 64 - What is this? You need to use the correct reference template and provide a full citation.

FN 42 - Page number?

FN 43 + FN 49 - Publishing date?

FN 50 + FN 51 + FN 59 + FN 71 + FN 72 + FN 73 + FN 76 + FN 85 - What is this? You need to use the correct reference template and provide a full citation.

FN 67 - How is this reliable?

FN 80 - Needs a full citation and multi page PDFs need page numbers.

FN 83 - YouTube is not a reliable source.

FN 86 - Needs a full citation. Puffin Let's talk! 17:14, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Prose meets GA standard - it is clear and readable without spelling or grammatical errors. (It is important to note the GA prose requirements, and not to expect a higher standard than what is already present in the article - GA is not an alternative FA, and the prose does not need to be of a high standard - it simply needs to adequately convey meaning).
  • Applicable MoS are met as regards the lead, the layout and words to watch.
  • It has an appropriate reference section, and every sentence is cited to a reliable source (which is more than is required for FA), and there is no evidence of original research as sources checked bear out what is in the article.
  • The long list of reference format problems listed above do not apply to GA criteria, and though some FA reviewers bring up such matters, such close attention to formatting is not even required by the FA criteria which only asks for a consistent citation format (that is, the article should either use footnotes or Harvard referencing, but not both).
  • Coverage is broad enough to cover major details of the brewery, but isn't overly excessive in any area, though the history section could perhaps be looked at to see if all the information is needed, and I feel there may be room for some reorganisation of material, and perhaps a section on the brewery as a building and a brewing plant could be created, so that - for example - Protz's comment regarding the brewing methods and equipment could be used more appropriately. But that is part of ongoing development and wouldn't impact on GA status.
  • Stable.
  • Images pass GA criteria. Though it's worth saying that Samuel Webster's logo could be used, that the pub images could be reduced, and an image of Webster's Yorkshire Bitter could be used. But, again, that is part of ongoing development.
  • Article comfortably meets GA criteria, and I assume that some work has taken place since this was nominated for Reassessment. SilkTork ✔Tea time 10:08, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. Ref 89 does not mention anything about the northern thirst nor Freddie Truman. This is one of the classic WP problems. Pseudo experts write a bunch of cr*p with bogus refs to backup their claims. No one checks them. From memory "drives out the Northern thirst" was subtly directed at Tennents canned lager from Glasgow. It was firstly Tennents cheap mass lager production that put many Yorkshire regional and cask breweries out of business. Then Carlsberg, Heineken, Fosters, etc.220.245.41.236 (talk) 06:32, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Websters.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Websters.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Websters.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:08, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Webster's Brewery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:33, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Webster's Brewery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:39, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Webster%27s_Brewery&oldid=1206838478"