Jump to content

Talk:Weaver stance

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The picture in the article is about isosceles, not weaver. This page has proper pictures for both: http://www.io.com/~cortese/firearms/index.html

Actually the stance is Isosceles but hold is not. Isosceles needs locked arms, as we can see from the link, but soldiers arms in the picture are bent. This hold looks more mixed Turret and Isosceles.


If the stance on the picture is Isosceles and the arms are what-ever, the picture doesn't belong to an article about the Weaver stance. I'll delete it. --Thosch66 19:58, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What, two jack weavers?

[edit]

The article starts crediting Jack Weaver with inventing the stance and winning a lot of competitions later on. Then the last sentence suggests there's two Weavers (no first name, so presumably both Jacks) and credit for invention is in doubt??

This page could really benefit from a picture or diagram.

[edit]

I'm sure we can find a trained individual and photograph them in the proper position. Get to work wikipedia peoples! 173.165.8.102 (talk) 01:08, 22 December 2010 (UTC) www.reedstargetshootingclub.co.uk has pics - worth asking? Also there's a lot of info on there that might be worth referncing? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.172.222.35 (talk) 14:45, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Isosceles Technique?

[edit]

I'm wondering, is there any page for the Isosceles Stance and the "modified isosceles?" They're quickly becoming the more common technique for handgun use, and it's strange that there's no companion article to weaver. I have to admit its hard to find any definite source on the technique, though. John 234 (talk) 05:36, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've written a start of one that was recently accepted. Isosceles Stance Kenny.dewhirst (talk) 01:56, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Right/Left-handed or right/left eye dominate??

[edit]

"A right-handed person will have the right foot angled out to the side and further to the rear. Most of the weight will be on the left foot, with the knee slightly bent. The shoulders will be leaned forward over the left toe. The right foot behind will help catch the force of recoil, as well as allow for rapid changes in position. A left-handed person will have the right foot forward."

Shouldn't this read,"A person firing right-handed ... and ... A left-handed firing person..."

I am not just left-handed, I kick footballs and such with my left foot. In fact, I believe you could say I am predominately left-sided by a wide margin; I even put my left pants leg, shirt sleeves, and socks/shoes on first when dressing. I also put my left contact lens in first. There are only two things, besides utilizing equipment that is only usable as right-handed, that I do right-handed. The first is welding (I can weld left-handed, too) and the second is firing a weapon.

Welding I learned from my father, who was right-handed. He said a good welder could weld with either hand and taught me to do so.

I fire a weapon right-handed because my right eye is the dominate one.

Therefor, is being right or left-handed the usable criteria? Or is it which is your dominate, or "sighting", eye.

I know; picky, picky,picky. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.135.98.75 (talk) 04:41, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In the context of shooting a gun, handedness strictly refers to which hand you use to pull the trigger, not which hand you would use for other things such as writing. And since the general rule is that your handedness while shooting should match your dominate eye, there is a built-in assumption that that is the case. - Bardbom (talk) 03:55, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Weaver stance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:25, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Needs an infobox

[edit]

Which infobox should we be using for an article like this? As a "technique", it doesn't fall into any that I can think of. Kartano (talk) 18:51, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Weaver_stance&oldid=1212522908"