Talk:We Are Paintermen/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Wetrorave (talk · contribs) 16:08, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Failed "good article" nomination
[edit]This article has failed its Good article nomination. This is how the article, as of June 15, 2021, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: yes
- 2. Verifiable?: yes
- 3. Broad in coverage?: no
- 4. Neutral point of view?: yes
- 5. Stable?: yes
- 6. Images?: yes
Unfortunately I'll have to ✗ Fail this. At a first look the article seems to small for a GAN. A closer look reveals that there is absolutely no info on any of the album's composition, recording, and artwork, thus being a long way of meeting the 'Broadness' criterion. These sections I've mentioned could use [1], [2], and [3] as sources.
When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far. — Wetrorave (talk) 16:08, 15 June 2021 (UTC)