Talk:Ways and Means (The West Wing)/GA2

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I have significant problems with the prose, general compliance with the Manual of Style for fiction, and the breadth of the coverage. This article, as well as the others in The West Wing, was nominated and certified as GA in 2007–2009, and these should be looked at again. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 08:48, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Made a couple of quick removals of bad content. No Reception section (summaries of reviews and ratings data), very short and File:Ways and Means1.JPG's rationale is not good enough as we don't use episode screenshots without significant rationales and related analytic content in the article (so I've nominated the file for deletion). It definitely falls well below GA standard (I'd give it Start-class or C-class). Pinging the creator, MZMcBride, though the main writer is no longer active (unsurprisingly given how long ago GA promotion was). — Bilorv (talk) 21:25, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]