Talk:Watts–Robinson Building
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Watts–Robinson Building article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Endash
[edit] Resolved
@Dicklyon: I see you've been moving some pages to replace dashes with endashes. Should this page be moved as well? ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:39, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
- I'm replacing hyphens with en dashes where appropriate, per MOS:DASH. I've collected a list of candidates at User:Dicklyon/Houses. Feel free to add to it, correct it, or help implement changes. In this case I'd say you're right, as Watts and Robinson are distinct people. The article is newer than my list, so should be added or just moved. Dicklyon (talk) 21:52, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Dicklyon: Done! Thanks, ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:05, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Architecture articles
- Low-importance Architecture articles
- Stub-Class California articles
- Low-importance California articles
- WikiProject California articles
- Stub-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Stub-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Articles created or improved during WikiProject United States' 50,000 Challenge
- WikiProject United States articles