Talk:Wattle Point Wind Farm

Australia: South Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Wattle Point Wind Farm is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject South Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of South Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposed merge with Edithburgh, South Australia

What is the basis of the merge proposal? I note that there are 16 stubs in Category:Wind farms in Australia. I have no idea if it's practical to expand a wind farm article to a full-length article or if it will always be a stub, but my first impression is that Edithburgh, South Australia does not really belong in the wind farms category, therefore to oppose the merge. I took the photos that are presently on both articles, but I'm happy to have different subjects on the Edithburgh article - they reflect what I take photos of, more than they reflect what Edithburgh is about. --Scott Davis ^Talk 21:56, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - the wind farm may be located near the town, but the two are separate entities and each deserves an article. If anything, perhaps remove the wind farm images from the town's article and provide some images of the town. (Scott, are you able to do that or were you passing through?) Webaware 21:58, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I spent a weekend there. I sorted through my photos later to see what I could add to Wikipedia, rather than targetting particular articles or images. I created the Edithburgh article to host the photos, before there was a push to create all the power station articles. I'll drop the bigger photo off the Edithburgh page pending someone finding/taking better Edithburgh pictures. The view of the windfarm from the town jetty would be better than the paddock view, plus one of some significant town buildings/streetscape. They're not the type of holiday snaps I take other than deliberately for Wikipedia. --Scott Davis ^Talk 02:57, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I too oppose the merge for the reasons discussed above. Johnfos 06:38, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose as per above. I can take some photos next time im there (aunty + uncle) --TheJosh 04:01, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rename in line with WP:TITLE

See Talk:Snowtown Wind Farm#Rename along with all other incorrectly named windfarm pages for centralised discussion. Donama (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Snowtown Wind Farm which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 00:03, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]