Talk:Watching the River Flow
Appearance
Watching the River Flow is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 3, 2021. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Help would be appreciated
[edit]I gather that deleting the previous assessment generates a new one? Any help with the formatting of this article would be appreciated. Craig Walker (talk) 00:47, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Watching the River Flow/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 16:52, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall: I did one minor edit. Nice overall. Regards.--Kürbis (✔) 11:00, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Thanks for GA, Great Orange Pumpkin. Mick gold (talk) 17:39, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Sheet music
[edit]Linking a sheet music source[1] is probably the better option. Otherwise, it may be considered WP:SYNTH to interpret it (X bars, etc.) —Ojorojo (talk) 16:20, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia featured articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- Old requests for peer review
- FA-Class song articles
- FA-Class Bob Dylan articles
- Mid-importance Bob Dylan articles
- FA-Class Rock music articles
- Low-importance Rock music articles
- WikiProject Rock music articles