Talk:Washington State Route 433/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –CG^Talk 23:38, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Some concerns:

• Can you merge the AADT and NHS paragraphs together?
  •  Done --Admrboltz (talk) 23:50, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
    • Looks good! –CG^Talk 00:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
• The paragraph in the history about the Seattle–Portland Bicycle Classic could be moved to RD, since its not a historical event.
  •  Done --Admrboltz (talk) 23:50, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
    • Looks good! –CG^Talk 00:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
• Could you expand the history to include the bridge's history?
  • The article is about the highway, not the bridge. If the reader wants to know more about the bridge, they can click on the link. --Admrboltz (talk) 23:50, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
• Moving the shields to history would be more relevant.
  • • You're right, but the bridge article is lacking in information. ;) –CG^Talk 00:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
  • While I agree, it would smush the text of the History section between the images & the infobox, which is not recommended in the MOS. --Admrboltz (talk) 23:50, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
    • Now I see it, good point. –CG^Talk 00:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
• Can you include an image of the bridge or highway from the bridge deck?
  •  Done --Admrboltz (talk) 23:50, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
    • Looks good! –CG^Talk 00:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, –CG^Talk 23:38, 23 November 2010 (UTC)