Talk:Washington State Route 16/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 01:33, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- The article says it is an east-west road but the major intersections says north-south. The article needs to be flipped per WP:USRD/STDS to describe the road in west to east progression and not east to west progression.
- WSDOT and the RCW describe SR 16 as beginning at I-5 in Tacoma and ending at SR 3, while the route is signed as east-west on highway shields.
- "The freeway bypasses Purdy to the east and passes Peninsula High School before intersecting SR 302 Spur and entering Kitsap County.[28][29][30] SR 16 passes the community of Burley and intersects its main access highway, Burley-Olalla Road, in an interchange before entering the city of Port Orchard" you use "passes" in two consecutive sentences.
- Replaced the first "passes"
- " After the collapse of the original bridge on November 7, 1949,[49] PSH 14 was truncated to Gig Harbor in 1949.", didn't Galloping Gertie collapse in 1940? Also, was 1949 the year PSH 14 was truncated and not 1940?
- Apparently, the Legislature didn't revised the route's description until 1949, but traffic was redirected to an alternate ferry landing.
- I would call the Exit list as Major intersections instead since it includes at-grade intersections.
- It does have exits and is a freeway for the majority of the route.
- The article says it is an east-west road but the major intersections says north-south. The article needs to be flipped per WP:USRD/STDS to describe the road in west to east progression and not east to west progression.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Is a detailed history of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge really necessary in the article? After all, the bridge has its own article.
- I'm not so sure on this one, but PSH 14/SR 16 give the bridge state funding and is a large portion of the highway's history, influencing some extensions/contractions.
- Is a detailed history of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge really necessary in the article? After all, the bridge has its own article.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
I will put the article on hold for fixes to be made. Dough4872 01:53, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- I will now pass the article. Dough4872 00:55, 28 March 2013 (UTC)