Jump to content

Talk:Warren Zevon on the Late Show with David Letterman in 2002

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleWarren Zevon on the Late Show with David Letterman in 2002 has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 15, 2023Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 20, 2022.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that when rock musician Warren Zevon received a terminal diagnosis of lung cancer, he learned to "enjoy every sandwich"?
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on October 30, 2023, and October 30, 2024.

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk18:57, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Created by The ed17 (talk). Self-nominated at 04:34, 2 November 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: @The ed17: Good article. Hook is interesting, article is sourced, and the QPQ is done. Onegreatjoke (talk) 14:50, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Warren Zevon on the Late Show with David Letterman in 2002/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 06:20, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


Unusual to see an article on one interview on one late night talk show, but the sources show clear enduring notability and significance.
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a. (reference section):
    b. (citations to reliable sources):
    c. (OR):
    d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a. (major aspects):
    b. (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
    There's really no getting around this non-free image, and it has an NFCC.
    b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/fail:
    Only minor copy adjustments and this will be ready to go.

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

Copy changes

[edit]
  • It is known for the humor that Zevon used throughout the interview, and for his quip that the terminal diagnosis was a reminder to "enjoy every sandwich". The comma is unneeded because there is only one subject in the whole sentence. See User:Sammi Brie/Commas in sentences. You can also use ", as well as" to keep the comma.
  • Zevon hoped to promote the album on an episode the Late Show Missing an "of"
  • The same outlet ranked the episode as one of the best late-night TV moments from 2002–2013, and separately at number five on a list of "most profound moments" in the Late Show with David Letterman's history. The comma isn't needed there either, but you can do "...2002–2013 and, separately, at...", which would probably be better.

Spot checks

[edit]

I went ahead and found ProQuest IDs for each of the non-linked references: 4, 5, 8, and 12. All of them also check out on quote reproduction and accurate representation.

Hello Sammi Brie! I've made the requested changes and thank you for the suggested edits. I used both of them. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 03:27, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
On Friday, I actually found myself in a sandwich place with a big sign saying "Enjoy Every Sandwich". After just having done this, I'm not so sure that's a coinkydink... Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 03:56, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.