Talk:Warren Anderson (American businessman)/Archives/2013

Totally wrong facts

I have not read cited source, if it is so then the source is very very faulty.The fact is that as per Indian Penal Code he could not have been given bail by Administative or police authorities , Only bail could have been given by a court but the bail request was never forwarded to court, so the bail given by administrative authorities was absolutley unconstitutional and verymuch illegal.

Indian Courts never granted him a bail and I am 20,000% sure that following sentense is incorrect.

After being arrested immediately after the disaster, he was released on bail by Indian courts.

Another thing is US diplomat on Indian Television Channels agreed that he was the fellow to negotiate and facilitate safe passage to warren anderson the chairman. Common americans will be very pleased if each of them too gets negotiated (un)diplomatic immunities and safe pasaages across all global shores and as a trophy they also get to meet presidents of such countries after all disasters they could..., Rather than Jimmy Wales, wikipedians need to propose warren anderson the chairman for nobel peace prize.Please let me know why that greate noble diplomats and politians who help negotiate immunities and safe pasaages and know all rules in the book to avoid extraditions, should not find their name in this article, after all other americans also would love to know great servicemen of their country.

Secondly why some one is censoring my writing on this talk page.It is absoultely unworthy of wikipedia culture.

Mahitgar (talk) 08:08, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Removed potentially libelous descriptor. Sandcherry (talk) 23:03, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: move to Warren Anderson (American businessman). -- tariqabjotu 22:51, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

---

Warren Anderson (chairman) → Warren Anderson (Union Carbide chairman) – There is another article Warren Anderson (businessman), most probably that's why we tried to distinguish here using "Chairman". Precision "Businessman" makes sense, but not "Chairman" since a chairman can be a businessman too! And more importantly "Chairman"– Chairman of what? So, I am asking this move Tito Dutta (talk) 15:59, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

• Support – "chairman" is a lame disambiguator. Dicklyon (talk) 01:20, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

• Oppose - disambiguating titles should be as general as possible so it should be Warren Anderson (American businessman).--ukexpat (talk) 18:20, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
• I agree with Dicklyon and Ukexpat alike—move both articles to Warren Anderson (American businessman) and Warren Anderson (Australian businessman). A quick Google check suggests neither is a primary topic. --BDD (talk) 17:28, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
  • Strong oppose the alternative suggestion i.e. Warren Anderson (American businessman) Warren Anderson is related to the controversial and unfortunate Bhopal disaster where 8000+ people died and 558,125 people got injured. Everyone knows Warren Anderson as chairman of Uninon Carbide (specially because of the disaster), not "American Businessman". For example, if we need to disambiguate Jimbo Wales it'll be much clearer with Jimbo Wales (Wikipedia founder) than Jimbo Wales (British entrepreneur). --Tito Dutta (talk) 17:56, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

I think "American businessman" is more within the spirit of WP:NCPDAB. Disambiguators linking people with specific groups (such as sport clubs, bands, companies) are generally only used when the specificity is required. --BDD (talk) 18:37, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

• Support Sandcherry (talk) 00:16, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
• I agree with BDD (talk · contribs)'s suggestion.--GDibyendu (talk) 15:28, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
• Also support BDD's suggestion - Warren Anderson (American businessman) vs Warren Anderson (Australian businessman). More natural disambiguation, every businessman is a chairman. Searching "Union Carbide" will still bring up the American businessman quickly. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:21, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
• Also support BDD suggestion - beyond the other reasons above, and he is the former chairman, so simply stating a businessman would be clearer. Tiggerjay (talk) 06:46, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.