Talk:Warnbro railway station/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 05:00, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look at this tomorrow when I am more awake! — Ghost River 05:00, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Infobox and lede

No comma needed after "with seven bus stands"
"The station was known as Waikiki station during planning. The station was included" → "Known as Waikiki station during planning, the station was included"

Description

First instance of "Transperth" in the body should be linked
No comma needed after "transit officer booth"

Public art

No comma needed after "with help from TUES"

History

"was planned on only being single track" → "was only intended to be single track"
No comma needed after "spur off the Armadale line"
"These changes caused the predicted patronage at Waikiki station to be lower." → 'These changes lowered the predicted patronage at Waikiki station."
"between Perth and Waikiki to be opened"

Services

"2013-14 financial year" → "2013–14 financial year"

References

Good

General comments

Photos are properly licensed and relevant
No stability concerns in the revision history
Earwig score looks good

All minor changes! Putting on hold for now; feel free to ping me with questions, and let me know when you're finished! — Ghost River 17:37, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for doing this review @GhostRiver:. I have made all the changes you requested. Steelkamp (talk) 01:37, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good now, happy to pass! — Ghost River 15:03, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]