Talk:Walter of Bruges

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Philosophy: Philosophers / Medieval Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers
	Medieval philosophy

Untitled

Some of the material on this page (namely the references) were taken from the internet page in question, but it is questionable whether references are copyright. The introduction is clearly not plagiarised. I plan further work on this article using the references, so please do not delete them. The Land Surveyor (talk) 18:57, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

it's the list of works, not the references that's the problem. I'm not sure every bit of the detail is needed here--it probably could be slightly shortened. But in any rate we don't delete the whole article because of a section. DGG (talk) 20:30, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agree but the list of primary sources will be of the most interest to anyone looking for material on this writer (who is difficult to find otherwise on the net). I can't see any of the material is superfluous, having had a second look. Thanks for the opinion, though. The Land Surveyor (talk) 20:45, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]