Talk:W (magazine)

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Fashion Mid‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

this article seems a little breathless at times... if anyone has time, maybe they can go through and make it a little less opinion-based? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.182.167.102 (talk • contribs)

Katie Holmes

Anyone know what became of the scan of the Katie Holmes cover of W? PedanticallySpeaking 16:52, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Main photo

Since the magazine has "haute couture appeal," wouldn't it be more appropriate for the main picture of a typical cover to be of a supermodel and not pop tart Britney Spears? 70.52.231.91 22:55, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My thoughts excactly. Britney isn't excactly representative of the gorgeous supermodels of haute couture that regularly grace W's cover... Can somebody please find a more appropriate cover? Thank you.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:W_%28magazine%29"

Please elaborate?

This article is a bit vague, to say the least.

"One can credit this with its narrow haute couture appeal"

A slight explanation would be nice to avoid misinterpretations.

The same goes for "self-aware elitism". There need to be some examples of how W is this exactly. Tomsintown 19:09, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since the magazine has "haute couture appeal," wouldn't it be more appropriate for the main picture of a typical cover to be of a supermodel and not pop tart Britney Spears? 70.52.231.91 22:55, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

-RE: comment above me: My thoughts excactly. Britney isn't excactly representative of the gorgeous supermodels of haute couture that regularly grace W's cover... Can somebody please find a more appropriate cover? Thank you.

I've added a Kate Moss cover before but this girl would not budge. Kept changing it. Kate has been featured more than any model. Or anyone really. And The Britney cover isn't a "typical" cover. I don't know what that's about. -- Bang Bang You're Dead 23 February 23:37 (UTC)

History?

When was the date of first publication? Why was it created? Why is it oversized? Needs a bit more historical context. --70.167.58.6 (talk) 22:45, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New investors include...

According to https://fashionweekdaily.com/investor-group-karlie-kloss-and-kaia-gerber-acquire-w/ the new investors include... Geo Swan (talk) 23:07, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]