Jump to content

Talk:WOLB

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:WOLB-AM.gif

[edit]

Image:WOLB-AM.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:54, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of WSID into WOLB

[edit]

WSID and WOLB are the same license; we generally try to keep a station's entire history within the same article. WCQuidditch 14:41, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support: I would like to see some more sources for the WSID part, which shouldn't be hard with AmericanRadioHistory.com. - NeutralhomerTalk • 01:23 on April 16, 2020 (UTC) • #StayAtHome
Support and I'm on it. Raymie (tc) 03:58, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk17:30, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that radio station WSID, located in a suburb of Baltimore, claimed a city court had no jurisdiction over it—and won? Sources: [1], p86
  • Reviewed: Nutrition Technologies
  • Comment: Might be a bit at the end of this one in terms of dates...cutting it close.

5x expanded by Raymie (talk). Self-nominated at 05:32, 30 April 2020 (UTC).[reply]

  • Nominated within seven days of expansion and is long enough. QPQ has been done. Article is neutral, reliably cited and not a copyright violation. Hook is fascinating, neutral and concise. GTG. MWright96 (talk) 17:50, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi, I came by to promote this, but the station didn't "win" the fact that the court had no jurisdiction over it; it was found not guilty and left off the case. I think the hook wording needs to be adjusted. Perhaps end the hook at over it? Yoninah (talk) 16:37, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]