Talk:Vought YA-7F

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Wow

Hard to imagine it possible to make the A-7 look even uglier looking, but this manages to do it. What a dog. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.158.48.160 (talk) 18:03, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vought or LTV?

Bill, you mentioned in your move that by the YA-7F's first flight in 1989 that Vought had become independent again. However, the Vought article states that Vought only separated from LTV in mid-1992. Shouldn't this make it an LTV, and not a Vought, product? Or am I missing something?

I do agree though, trying to parse out all of LTV's corporate reshuffling is a nightmare.

Also, thanks for the courteous response. –Noha307 (talk) 03:32, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my edit summary wasn't very clear. I said "by which time it was Vought again", which was supposed to mean "by which time it (the aerospace division, not LTV the parent) was known as Vought again". Though upon further review of the Vought article, the division may have been known as LTV again by 1989. It's too bad the Flight International archives are down for upgrading, as that is always a good source of contemporary (mid 80's) information. Unfortunately, I don't have access to AvWeek's archives either. - BilCat (talk) 04:12, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]