Talk:Volcanic Seven Summits

Volcanoes High‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mountains Mid‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Continent#Number of continents|continent model]] The anchor (#Number of continents) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Map request

Reqmap for Volcanic Seven Second Summits.

An elevation world map has been added. Are you asking for maps of each summit? Mheart (talk) 19:46, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Volcanoes in Tibet higher than Damavand

A Chinese source has identified a pair of 5800m mountains in Tibet with more than 500 metres of prominence which are claimed to be extinct volcanoes. More details to follow. Viewfinder (talk) 21:26, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Accuracy of maps in Chile and Argentina

"Although topographic maps of the Chile and Argentina border region which contains the highest peaks are of notoriously poor accuracy, with elevation errors exceeding 100 metres (330 ft) in many cases". What is the basis for that claim? I am not aware of the quality of Argentinean maps, but I know by my own experience that the altitudes given in the Chilean ones (IGM maps) are very accurate and have been carefully measured... --Jopiquer (talk) 05:18, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hawaii

I agree with reluctance, that the island of New Guinea is part of the same "continent" as Australia, as it rides on the same tectonic plate and is separated from the continent by a narrow and shallow strait which has been dry land in recent, pre-historic times. As you could reason that Britain is geologically part of Europe. But the claim that Hawaii is part of Australia is nonsense. It is on a different plate, it is over 9000 km from the nearest part of Australia. Most mid-oceanic islands are not part of any continent and people need to come to terms with that instead of trying to shoe-horn them in.Eregli bob (talk) 08:48, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Volcanic Seven Summits. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120217041344/http://www.gsajournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-abstract&doi=10.1130%2F0016-7606(1971)82%5B1605:VAGLOM%5D2.0.CO%3B2 to http://www.gsajournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-abstract&doi=10.1130%2F0016-7606(1971)82%5B1605%3AVAGLOM%5D2.0.CO%3B2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:14, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]