Talk:Violeta Went to Heaven

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

Chile Low‑importance

	Chile portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chile, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chile on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChileWikipedia:WikiProject ChileTemplate:WikiProject ChileChile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women artists

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists articles

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Cúchullain ^t/c 16:35, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Violeta → Violeta (film)
Violeta (disambiguation) → Violeta

– I don't think that a documentary is the primary meaning. To make room for Violeta (disambiguation) to move to Violeta. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:09, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

*Support. Maybe you could create the disambig page first, before moving an article? Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 19:11, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I thought of that, but I wanted to avoid the move process... -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:16, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~Weak oppose, probably~~ [Neutral] - there's basically only two subjects here Violeta (name) and Violeta a dramatic film (not a documentary) that wom the World Cinema Jury Prize (Dramatic) at the 2012 Sundance Film Festival. Is there anything that needs to disambiguated? The primary subject is probably "the name Violeta" - but no one is known as just "Violeta" other than the film. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:26, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good point - so leave as is with a hatnote pointing to the disambig page. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 12:48, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Having seen that the biopic is at es:Violeta se fue a los cielos on es.wp, makes it less likely that the film will continuing reference in serious sources under the abbreviated English title "Violeta" so Violeta (film) seems more useful. Noting Anthony Appleyard's comment below that Violeta (disambiguation) created by nominator now has 26 alternatives, but with respect what AndrewA says below "There are several other articles named at the DAB that could claim the name Violeta were it not for the need to disambiguate." is incorrect, look again, the disamb isn't a true disamb it is Violeta (name) with a couple of "see also"s - small but significant difference. Nevertheless, given the es.wp full film name no bad thing to reward nominator's hard work with the requested move and get this off RM backlog, changed to Neutral. In ictu oculi (talk) 21:40, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You know, if this had been a simple Violeta (name) → move and hadn't been confused by the oddness of the disambiguation page (which is a name page) ... it would have been a simple support as the name is WP:PRIMARY. It would actually make sense to move it and fix the cats as a name article. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:52, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support such a generic title should have a clear primary use, or be a disambiguation page. -- 65.92.181.190 (talk) 06:23, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

But no other article has that title, or is likely to. If Violeta was so generic, why are the only incoming links to it for the film and not to dozens, if not hundreds of other articles? Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 09:37, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Incoming links is no measure for primary meaning because it could have been categorically cleaned up or edited. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:00, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Far too generic and far too little known to be primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:01, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support. There are several other articles named at the DAB that could claim the name Violeta were it not for the need to disambiguate. Andrewa (talk) 12:02, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per IIO. No evidence presented that anything listed on the dab page, other than the doco currently at the primary location, is referred to simply as "Violeta" in reliable sources. Jenks24 (talk) 11:00, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Violeta (disambiguation) now has 26 alternatives. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:42, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but still only 1 thing called "Violeta", Violeta (disambiguation) isn't a disamb page, it needs → Violeta (name) In ictu oculi (talk) 21:50, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support. My first thought on hearing/reading the word "Violeta" is that it can be a person's (first) name. 213.246.91.158 (talk) 09:18, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

But no other article is simply titled Violeta. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 10:36, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So, I'd say the article "Violeta" should first and foremost address that word being a first name for a person, even if that makes the article short and/or mostly pointers to other uses. Apologies if I've misunderstood. 213.246.91.158 (talk) 07:21, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Violeta Went to Heaven. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120209032600/http://www.biobiochile.cl:80/2011/08/11/violeta-se-fue-a-los-cielos-de-andres-wood-parra-no-cabe-en-una-sola-pelicula.shtml to http://www.biobiochile.cl/2011/08/11/violeta-se-fue-a-los-cielos-de-andres-wood-parra-no-cabe-en-una-sola-pelicula.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:35, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]