Talk:Vici Media Group
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily Caller as reference
[edit]Despite being deprecated by Wikipedia, I chose to use a Daily Caller link to back up the impact of joebiden.info. There are other references but I feel it was important, in balance, to include. tedder (talk) 19:32, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- The Daily Caller deprecation RFC says:
There is an overwhelming majority, arguments and all, for option 4: Publishes false or fabricated information, and should be deprecated as in the 2017 RfC of the Daily Mail.
The 2017 Daily Mail RFC says:its use as a reference is to be generally prohibited
. This is a strong general consensus, which would be difficult to reasonably override with WP:LOCALCONSENSUS. - What makes Daily Caller overwhelmingly the correct source to use here, over and above any other possible source? - David Gerard (talk) 16:07, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class United States Presidents articles
- Low-importance United States Presidents articles
- WikiProject United States Presidents articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- Start-Class American politics articles
- Unknown-importance American politics articles
- American politics task force articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Start-Class Conservatism articles
- Low-importance Conservatism articles
- WikiProject Conservatism articles