Talk:Viburnum tinus

Question the photo

I question whether the photo is of Viburnum tinus. It doesn't look like the photos here or here. In particular, it is missing the pink buds and flower stems.

I don't currently have access to a camera, but when I can, I'll try uploading another (a better?) photo.

Limeguin (talk) 08:31, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The first image at [1] is definitely atypical, probably one of the pink flowered cultivars. The photo currently shown here has light pink buds. It looks like tinus to me. Imc (talk) 19:13, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Subspecies

The subspp from the Canary Islands and Azores are now usually treated as separate spp (V. rigidum and V. treleasei). I've not seen a living V. treleasei, but V. rigidum is clearly and consistently very different from V. tinus.81.141.241.47 (talk) 14:37, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Leaf life span (LLS)

If this helps: I was looking at this paper and saw that the leaf life span for the Viburnum tinus, Caprifoliaceae is 369 ± 10.7 (days). States: "This study was conducted in Mediterranean old-fields over a 4-yr period on 42 species differing in successional status."

"Leaf life span, dynamics and construction cost of species from Mediterranean old-fields differing in successional status"
Marie-Laure Navas, Béatrice Ducout, Catherine Roumet, Jean Richarte, Joël Garnier, Eric Garnier.
New Phytologist,
Volume 159, Issue 1, pages 213–228, July 2003.
Article first published online: 12 JUN 2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00790.x
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00790.x/full

Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 17:41, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Viburnum tinus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131009235729/http://www.rhs.org.uk/Gardening/News/Top-10-pests to http://www.rhs.org.uk/Gardening/News/Top-10-pests

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:21, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

beneficial medicinally?

This article should not make this assertion esp. if one of the symptoms after having consumed it is "stomach upset". One person's "upset" could be another's vomit marathon or worse and since you are not a medical doctor and since you should know that some idiot may eat it you need to take this off the site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.138.88.151 (talk) 07:13, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]