Talk:Vibe (Tove Styrke song)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 07:51, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

This article can be reviewed in one day! --K. Peake 07:51, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

Why is electronic not listed next to pop in genres under the infobox?
Add a comma after third studio album
The songwriting and production sentence should be the second of the first para instead
"five months after the album's original release." → "five months after the original release."
"issued "Vibe" as" → "issued it as"
"Musically, "Vibe" is an" → "It is an"
"contrary to other Sway tracks" → "contrary to the album's other tracks"
""Vibe" was met with generally positive reviews" → ""Vibe" received generally positive reviews" and add what they praised about it

Done the first part, but I don't really know how to summarize the reviews. Do you see a common thread in the reviews? Pancake (talk) 19:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"the single appeared below" → "the song appeared below"
"peaking at number ten" → "peaking at number 10" per MOS:NUM
Remove pipe on Heatseeker
"of the United Kingdom and Nordic legs" → "of the British and Nordic legs" for consistency with the way you refer to these areas

I believe all of these have been addressed. Pancake (talk) 19:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Background

"Soon after the release" → "Shortly after the release"

Done.

"she had been working" → "Styrke had been working"

Done.

The source does not say it was only added to digital editions

Well it says it was added. A song can't be added to physical editions without the album being re-released, which it never was. The only versions of the album were issued before this song. I don't know how to cite the fact that it isn't on physical editions. Pancake (talk) 19:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Composition and lyrics

Audio sample looks good!
Pipe chorus to Refrain
Since the guitar-heavy sentence essentially uses part of the same quote, why don't you paraphrase the second part to something like she had wanted to create a guitar-based song for a while?
Remove the comma after percussion
"She elaborated, "It's" → "Styrke elaborated that "it's"
"a bit sadder."" → "a bit sadder"." per MOS:QUOTE (this is not a full sentence in the source)'

All done! Pancake (talk) 19:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Release and reception

"Styrke told MyLondon that" → "Styrke told MyLondon,"
"In December 2018, she performed" → "In December 2018, Styrke performed"
""Vibe" received general praise from" → ""Vibe" was met with general praise from"
"song showcased Styrke's" → "song showcases Styrke's"
Remove the introduction to Bands of Tomorrow
Add a space about December 2018's comma
"was critical of it in" → "was critical of the performance in"
Mention that "On the Low" and "Sway" were 2018 singles
"peaked at number ten" → "peaked at number 10" per MOS:NUM

Done and done! Pancake (talk) 19:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Credits and personnel

Good

Charts

Good

Release history

Format → Format(s)

Done.

There are not various citations to back up digital download and streaming

Source says "Also available in the iTunes Store". Should I include an additional source? Pancake (talk) 19:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

Copyvio score looks decent at 39%
Cite BroadwayWorld as publisher instead on ref 7
Add url-access limited to ref 18
What exactly makes ref 20 a reliable source?

From what I can tell it's a well-known music magazine in Denmark. I have found their reviews cited in articles by DR and JydskeVestkysten, [1][2]. I'm not Danish myself but it seems reliable. Pancake (talk) 19:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Add url-access subscription to ref 22
Wikilink Sverigetopplistan on ref 26 instead of ref 27

Done! Pancake (talk) 19:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Final comments and verdict

On hold until all of the issues are fixed; nice work here! --K. Peake 09:14, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review! Appreciate it :) Pancake (talk) 19:22, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PancakeMistake Thanks for going over this, however change electronic and pop to two separate genres in the infobox, add at least a vague part like "some of whom" after music critics to summarize something that was praised by at least a few and add citations from various countries retailers for digital download and streaming. --K. Peake 09:31, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Peake Tried to summarize the reviews, let me know what you think. Genre and various retailers, done. Pancake (talk) 17:58, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Pass now, I briefly copyedited but nice job! --K. Peake 20:17, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]