Jump to content

Talk:Vibe (Tove Styrke song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleVibe (Tove Styrke song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 17, 2023Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Vibe (Tove Styrke song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 07:51, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

This article can be reviewed in one day! --K. Peake 07:51, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

[edit]
  • Why is electronic not listed next to pop in genres under the infobox?
  • Add a comma after third studio album
  • The songwriting and production sentence should be the second of the first para instead
  • "five months after the album's original release." → "five months after the original release."
  • "issued "Vibe" as" → "issued it as"
  • "Musically, "Vibe" is an" → "It is an"
  • "contrary to other Sway tracks" → "contrary to the album's other tracks"
  • ""Vibe" was met with generally positive reviews" → ""Vibe" received generally positive reviews" and add what they praised about it
Done the first part, but I don't really know how to summarize the reviews. Do you see a common thread in the reviews? Pancake (talk) 19:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • "the single appeared below" → "the song appeared below"
  • "peaking at number ten" → "peaking at number 10" per MOS:NUM
  • Remove pipe on Heatseeker
  • "of the United Kingdom and Nordic legs" → "of the British and Nordic legs" for consistency with the way you refer to these areas
I believe all of these have been addressed. Pancake (talk) 19:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Background

[edit]
  • "Soon after the release" → "Shortly after the release"
Done.
  • "she had been working" → "Styrke had been working"
Done.
  • The source does not say it was only added to digital editions
Well it says it was added. A song can't be added to physical editions without the album being re-released, which it never was. The only versions of the album were issued before this song. I don't know how to cite the fact that it isn't on physical editions. Pancake (talk) 19:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Composition and lyrics

[edit]
  • Audio sample looks good!
  • Pipe chorus to Refrain
  • Since the guitar-heavy sentence essentially uses part of the same quote, why don't you paraphrase the second part to something like she had wanted to create a guitar-based song for a while?
  • Remove the comma after percussion
  • "She elaborated, "It's" → "Styrke elaborated that "it's"
  • "a bit sadder."" → "a bit sadder"." per MOS:QUOTE (this is not a full sentence in the source)'
All done! Pancake (talk) 19:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Release and reception

[edit]
  • "Styrke told MyLondon that" → "Styrke told MyLondon,"
  • "In December 2018, she performed" → "In December 2018, Styrke performed"
  • ""Vibe" received general praise from" → ""Vibe" was met with general praise from"
  • "song showcased Styrke's" → "song showcases Styrke's"
  • Remove the introduction to Bands of Tomorrow
  • Add a space about December 2018's comma
  • "was critical of it in" → "was critical of the performance in"
  • Mention that "On the Low" and "Sway" were 2018 singles
  • "peaked at number ten" → "peaked at number 10" per MOS:NUM
Done and done! Pancake (talk) 19:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Credits and personnel

[edit]
  • Good

Charts

[edit]
  • Good

Release history

[edit]
  • Format → Format(s)
Done.
  • There are not various citations to back up digital download and streaming
Source says "Also available in the iTunes Store". Should I include an additional source? Pancake (talk) 19:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]
  • Copyvio score looks decent at 39%
  • Cite BroadwayWorld as publisher instead on ref 7
  • Add url-access limited to ref 18
  • What exactly makes ref 20 a reliable source?
From what I can tell it's a well-known music magazine in Denmark. I have found their reviews cited in articles by DR and JydskeVestkysten, [1][2]. I'm not Danish myself but it seems reliable. Pancake (talk) 19:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Add url-access subscription to ref 22
  • Wikilink Sverigetopplistan on ref 26 instead of ref 27
Done! Pancake (talk) 19:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Final comments and verdict

[edit]
Thanks for the review! Appreciate it :) Pancake (talk) 19:22, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • PancakeMistake Thanks for going over this, however change electronic and pop to two separate genres in the infobox, add at least a vague part like "some of whom" after music critics to summarize something that was praised by at least a few and add citations from various countries retailers for digital download and streaming. --K. Peake 09:31, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Vibe_(Tove_Styrke_song)&oldid=1209997165"