Talk:Vesnin brothers

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia Mid‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Congratulations

To the editor's here. An interesting and comprehensive article about one of the prime forces behind a particularly interesting period of Russian architectural history. --Joopercoopers (talk) 14:48, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Now let's get personal

That is, to Alexander Vesnin and Victor Vesnin (I haven't seen Leonid's own bio, so he'll have to wait). I'm not sure how they should look - how much of common info from Vesnin brothers should be reproduced in individual articles, or, if compressed to summary style, how densely compressed - for a proper balance between solo and team work. Ideas? NVO (talk) 19:40, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm - that is a thorny one. A few thoughts - we have no separate articles for Charles and Ray Eames as they're usually mentioned in tandem in the sources - admittedly our current article on them needs some work (and surely there's a free image of the chair somewhere?), but I wonder about the necessity to have separate articles at all (or more amusingly see Bastard brothers). Ultimately perhaps we should look at what added encyclopaedic value might be gained from separate articles. I suggest that, as they worked very closely together until Leonid's death, and Alexander's work after this was minimal, the only strong case for a separate bio might be Victor, but really all this could do is flesh out his work under Stalin - perhaps this article could do that more and dispense with the separate article.

Of course there could be bios for all three, fleshing out their personal life etc. but my, admittedly partisan view, is that architects are usually notable for their architecture, rarely is the tittle-tattle particularly notable - unless you're Louis Kahn or Wright of course. (My old boss interviewed Clough Williams-Ellis, who had met Wright a few times - "Terrible man, used to sleep with his client's you know?", and then there was the fire..... - damn it, I'm at it now.....save for ok magazine I think.) --Joopercoopers (talk) 01:18, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NVO, I think you should write as much about them as time and interest permits. I know I for one would read them eagerly. If Khan-Magomedov wrote a book about Aleksandr then there should be enough for a whole article on him. Though if Joopercoopers thinks there should be a separate article on Victor then maybe there should be one on him too. I think if we have separate articles on one of them then we should have them for all of them even if they aren't all at the same level of detail. I would try for as much original material in each article with as little summary as possible. DVD 20:28, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vesnin-pravda-s.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Vesnin-pravda-s.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:38, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Vesnin brothers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:59, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]