Talk:Verbal intelligence

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics High‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

Psychology High‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2013 Q3. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Georgia Institute of Technology/Introduction to Neuroscience (Fall 2013)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.

Untitled

1. Quality of Information: 2
2. Article size: 2
3. Readability: 2
4. Refs: 2
5. Links: 2
6. Responsive to comments: 2
7. Formatting: 2
8. Writing: 1

a few grammatical errors spread throughout the article

9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 1

real name not easily apparent in username or userpage to those unfamiliar with Georgia Tech username system

10. Outstanding?: 2
_______________
Total: 18 out of 20

Michaelrchen (talk) 19:38, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments. I looked through and fixed many grammatical errors. Also, I added my real name to my user page. Thanks. Mcorrin3 (talk) 02:37, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1. Quality of Information: 2
2. Article size:2
3. Readability:2
4. Refs:2
5. Links:2
6. Responsive to comments: 2
7. Formatting:2
8. Writing:0

Grammar errors

9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page:0

Not GT username

10. Outstanding?:1

Needs to improve more.

_______________
Total: 17 out of 20 JaeHyung Choi (talk) 02:25, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments. I looked over the article again for grammar errors and fixed a couple more mistakes. I also added my real name to the TALK page, whereas before it was only on my user page. Thanks. Mcorrin3 (talk) 02:35, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1. Quality of Information: 2
2. Article size: 2
3. Readability: 2
4. Refs: 2
5. Links: 2
6. Responsive to comments: 2
7. Formatting: 2
8. Writing: 1
-Some slight grammatical errors- nothing major.
9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 0
-Real name not present on user talk page- easily fixed.
10. Outstanding?: 2
_______________
Total: 17 out of 20
Ryan Chu (talk) 16:00, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments. Hopefully the vast majority of errors have been fixed, and my real name should now be easily accessible via my User page and my TALK page. Thanks again. Mcorrin3 (talk) 02:35, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OCD

Article should meaning OCD, as in the OCD article "verbal IQ" is listed as one of the few positives of the brain type. Squish7 (talk) 02:32, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merger

Most sources already listed here are about broader verbal intelligence, not just the linguistic aspects. I will work to incorporate parts of verbal reasoning into this article, and eventually nominate it (it's even shorter than this one) for deletion. I am also in the process of changing the name of this article to "Verbal intelligence". Iroh (talk) 14:30, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]