Talk:Variolation

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Variolation article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Medicine High‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Viruses High‑importance

	Viruses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirusesWikipedia:WikiProject VirusesTemplate:WikiProject Virusesvirus articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Redundant articles on variolation/inoculation

This article may contain content identical or similar to another topic. Please see Talk:History of smallpox
Mathglot (talk) 22:44, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. As a new user, I'm certainly frustrated that the discussion of this subject is split between two parallel articles. I understand that the original idea was to have Variolation to be the narrow article on smallpox only, and Inoculation be the broad article describing other uses of the technique (see this discussion) but it seems like that goal was not achieved. I believe that we should either merge these two articles, integrating the content, or enforce the split as originally envisioned. Either way, the history of the smallpox technique should be in one article, with appropriate summary and links in other articles. Hi-storian (talk) 19:30, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why did it work?

The article could benefit from a scientific section discussing why variolation had a different outcome from regular infection with the disease -- in terms of infection and response in the body, why was it that regular infection would produce a full-blown attack of smallpox, but variolation apparently did not? Jheald (talk) 09:41, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This section does not actually disclose the difference between vaccination and variolation

It is important that material on Wikipedia on vaccination be informative and accurate.

Yet, this section does not actually say what the difference(s) between vaccination and variolation is / are. Is the difference (or one of them) that variolation involves administering material from the disease that one is trying to stop the patient from getting, whereas vaccination involves administering material from a slightly different disease? Or what?

PlacidGoldfish willThisDo (talk) 01:06, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Variolation was the method of inoculation first used to immunize individuals against smallpox (Variola) with material taken from a patient or a recently variolated individual, in the hope that a mild, but protective, infection would result. Only 1–2% of those variolated died from the intentional infection compared to 30% who contracted smallpox naturally. Variolation is no longer used today. It was replaced by the smallpox vaccine, a safer alternative. This in turn led to the development of the many vaccines now available against other diseases. 86.3.140.217 (talk) 13:36, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]