Jump to content

Talk:Varaha Upanishad/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 13:30, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Will review. Sainsf <^>Talk all words 13:30, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

[edit]
  • and Ultimate Reality "the" Ultimate Reality
  • Done
  • Can you add a line about what an Upanishad is?
  • Done. Added to main with source, and shorter one to lead.
  • "Ribhu" need not be in italics
  • Done by @Nvvchar

Etymology and anthology

[edit]
  • the incarnation of Vishnu as boar of "Hindu god" Vishnu, as "a" boar
  • Done
  • it was created between the 13th and 16th centuries Specify the time of its creation in the lead too.
  • Done
  • Link Vedic literature
  • Done
  • Reword: Varaha Upanishad was listed neither in the anthology of ... Shikoh, nor in the early 19th-century Henry Thomas Colebrooke anthology or the Narayana compilations of Upanishads.
  • Done

Chronology

[edit]
  • The text is one of the Yoga Upanishads This repeats what was mentioned in the last section
  • Removed second instance
  • other Yoga Upanishads, it was composed Semicolon instead of comma.
  • Done
  • Who is Antonio Rigopoulos? Historian?
  • Added he is a professor in Italy
  • possibly in the middle of 2nd millennium CE Did you mean BCE?
  • No. This is a late Upanishad. The earliest Yoga Upanishads are dated to ~4th/2nd-century BCE, the last ones ~15th century CE.

Contents

[edit]
  • Very well-written.
  • Well done @Nvvchar !!
  • Only the duplinks are the problem: Agni (Tattvas), Brahman (Brahmavidya), karma (Sankalpa), Yoga (Samadhi), Upanishad (Axiology)
  • Removed
  • There is problem in ref. no. 46.
  • Fixed

Nice article. Those were my comments. Sainsf <^>Talk all words 13:30, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Sainsf: Thanks for the review. I will shortly check the sources and address these points. @Nvvchar: give me 24 hours, please double check / add. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 14:55, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Nvvchar: Anything I missed? Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 16:45, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you both! This article is a GA now.--Sainsf <^>Talk all words 18:15, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks, Sainsf. As the AutoBot does not leave any message on my nomination both at the start of the GA review and after approval, can you please leave a message of this GA approval on our talk pages?--Nvvchar. 01:10, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry I have no idea how to do that. There may be some script that is blocking the bot, or is it something else? I think it is Legobot who is involved with GANs. Sainsf <^>Talk all words 02:02, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]