Talk:Valimai

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Valimai article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1: 3 months

view · edit

Frequently asked questions

Q1: The box office for this movie is wrong, this movie grossed X.

A1: Please make sure the the information you provide is not already in the article, and that the source you provide is reliable.

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Tamil Nadu / Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tamil Nadu (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Box office collection from the producer himself - manobala vidyabalan.

https://twitter.com/ManobalaV/status/1526588136691683333?t=wAaAbY5jbG8eAPLG6Lf8Hw&s=19 Kichawww (talk) 19:17, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 18 May 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

1. It is confirmed that VALIMAI has collected more than ₹230 Crores. The collections should be specifically mentioned and updated. There are plenty of valuable sources to prove that. The statement from Jatinder Singh of Pinkvilla is simply incorrect and irrelevant.

2. Box office est. ₹155.45–234 crore[a]

3. https://www.hindustantimes.com/entertainment/tamil-cinema/valimai-box-office-report-ajith-kumar-s-film-enters-rs-100-crore-club-in-just-3-days-101645951234861-amp.html

https://m.timesofindia.com/entertainment/tamil/movies/box-office/valimai-lifetime-box-office-collection-this-ajith-starrer-film-mints-rs-234-crore-turns-the-9th-highest-grosser-film-in-tamil-nadu/amp_articleshow/90734046.cms

https://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/bollywood/box-office-collection/ajith-film-valimai-bheemla-nayak-pawan-kalyan-box-office-collection-7803512/lite/ 2406:B400:A9:7FEB:ECB2:5DD0:5D17:1EFA (talk) 02:50, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now: This is a contentious edit, or this has already been discussed, so you'll need to discuss first with other editors. If there is an existing discussion on the talk page please contribute to that section. If there is no existing discussion you may explain why this edit should be made in this section, or start a new section on this talk page. Ab207 (talk) 06:20, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Box office India exposed Jatinder Singh

Expecting Wikipedia to be fair & square .

This is an article from 2018 where No.1 Portal in India Box office India openly exposed Jatinder Singh and his website Cinetrak for deliberately reducing 2.0's numbers.

Article link: https://boxofficeindia.com/report-details.php?articleid=4482

He is known for giving Deliberate discounts for Rajini, Ajith movies.

Hence requesting Wikipedia to remove Pinkvilla( Jatinder Singh's ) reports for Valimai & retain only Times of India's report which is a neutral page.

As per Manobala, Beast WW end collections as 153 crores. I don't see that in Beast Wikipedia section. Expecting the same Fair & square treatment for Valimai by removing Mr.Jatinder Singh's Pinkvilla article who has put N number of tweets in twitter openly degrading Ajith . Arjun19990012 (talk) 08:12, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion on this was already carried out back in March 2022 and the current manner of presenting box office numbers was reached as a solution. Ab207 LuK3

See discussion here.

Also, in the Box Office India link above they do not explicitly name Jatinder Singh or Cinetrak. Ajith fans such as Arjun19990012 can take a hike. If u have concerns regarding Beast, you can raise them at the talk page of that movie. The Twitter account of Jatinder Singh (which does not even exist now) cannot be taken as evidence in any case.

(103.182.166.194 (talk) 12:10, 14 January 2023 (UTC))[reply]

Not at all brother, I am a neutral guy . I want Wikipedia to be fair and square. Twitter account of Jatinder Singh exists . This is his new Twitter account : @mejat32 You can go and check Jatinder's numbers for 2.0 . Except him, no one mentioned 12,13 crs gross figures for 2point0 day1. So it's quite clear that Box office India mentioned him only 👍.DOT You cannot hide that fact bro .

Therefore, it's extremely ethical of me to remove a biased guy Jatinder's source from Wikipedia.

Arjun19990012 (talk) 17:17, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is not our job to go and search for those tweets. If you have to make a change to this article, you have to discuss with others and reach consensus. In any case, the Twitter account you mentioned is not verified and it could belong to anybody. Also, the account was formed in December 2020, two years after the release of 2.0. Better luck next time brother.

P.S. Box Office India is not the final word on everything. It is only one of many reliable sources. Even if they diss a source, that does not make that source unreliable.

Arjun19990012 Ab207 LuK3

(103.182.166.194 (talk) 18:00, 14 January 2023 (UTC))[reply]

His account was suspended and he re-joined twitter on December 2020 In his account , it clearly says he is the writer in Pinkvilla .

There are N number of tweets where he openly degraded Ajith . I can share those tweet links if you want.

The guy has a reputation of leaning towards Vijay and giving bumper discounts for other actors. He was even exposed by BOI.

Wikipedia is always Fair & Square and there is no room for Ajith / Vijay leaners here 👍

Only Neutral sources should be considered. So sorry bro 👍

If someone deliberately reduces Vijay's bo figures, he should be blacklisted as well 👍

Arjun19990012 (talk) 14:56, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1. Where is the proof tortoise? You blabbering all this doesn't prove anything. 👍

2. I mentioned this above, but if you are too slow to read and comprehend, I will say it again.

Box Office India is not the final word on everything. It is only one of many reliable sources. Even if they diss a source, that does not make that source unreliable.

Arjun19990012 Ab207 LuK3

(103.183.83.171 (talk) 16:47, 15 January 2023 (UTC))[reply]

Hello brother. By calling me tortoise, Are you proclaiming yourself as a squirrel?

Manobala Vijayan is not reliable for Beast , whereas Jatinder Singh is reliable for Valimai ?

I need to know on what basis u come to this conclusion?

I will share the tweet links where Jatinder Singh degraded Ajith / Ajith movies openly. Recently he deleted so many of those tweets as well.

A sample tweet: https://twitter.com/meJat32/status/1379329666914250755?s=20

The person he is replying to is "Mithun Raman" - a member of Vijay fans club .Both together run Cinetrak which Jatinder Singh has openly admitted so many times .

How can such a biased person be considered as source for Ajith movies ?

If Jatinder Singh's article is included for Valimai, then Manobala's article should be included for Beast.

We need Wikipedia to be fair & square 👍

Arjun19990012 (talk) 08:40, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What is degrading or derogatory about that tweet? Is this all you could find after all the searching?

And believe it or not, I'm not a squirrel.

(103.148.20.156 (talk) 09:20, 16 January 2023 (UTC))[reply]

If there is any other trustable source for Valimai box office apart from Jatinder Singh , pls go ahead and make those changes. No one can question it including me.

All I am saying is a biased guy like Mr.Jatinder Singh's Pinkvilla reports should not be considered.

Manobala was excluded for Beast's collections . Similarly , Jatinder should be excluded for Valimai's collections..

Isn't this a Fair thing to ask brother ? I hope and believe that Wikipedia will be Fair& Genuine.

Arjun19990012 (talk) 09:43, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Credibility of Pinkvilla

As 103.148.20.156 brother suggested , let's have a healthy discussion.

Ps: I will not make any changes . Changes will be only made only after this discussion is made.

The entire world of twitter knows that Mr.Jatinder Singh is biased towards Vijay and his hatred towards Ajith / Rajini can clearly be seen .

In this discussion, with Solid proofs - I will expose Jatinder Singh . & Then we can come to a conclusion 👍. Thank you. Arjun19990012 (talk) 09:54, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Times of India article

As per the recent Times of India article, Thunivu has made 110 crores in 4 days. Please update it. Here is the link:

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/tamil/movies/box-office/thunivu-box-office-collection-day-4-ajiths-action-drama-hits-100-crores/articleshow/97003515.cms?from=mdr Ganesh0102 (talk) 10:16, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry my bad. I have posted this on a wrong page 😂. Ganesh0102 (talk) 10:20, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]