Talk:Uyghur Arabic alphabet

	Writing portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Central Asia Low‑importance

	Asia portal Uyghur Arabic alphabet is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Tibet, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang and Central Asian portions of Iran, Pakistan and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.Central AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Central AsiaCentral Asia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Emphatic Arabic Letters

In the table of pre-1950 letters you do not include emphatic letters ص ض ط ظ, but in one of the examples (ينگي حصار) you use one of them. Maybe these should be added to the table together with the appropriate phonetic realizations?

Yannis (talk) 15:45, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

?

Are you sure "latin" and "ULY" are in the good place in the table ? Because Ə ə Ɵ ɵ and Ƣƣ are not latin letters for me :/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.2.79.161 (talk) 08:35, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ه‍ (ə) and ه‍ (h)

one thing that I do not understand so far is how these letters can work. They have the same shape, don't they? Isn't there any danger of mixing them up? --Man77^talk 23:49, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You got the wrong letters. The letters in the table are different and can be distingushed. -- Prince Kassad (talk) 14:53, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They were same during the Ottoman time. If it is "ə", the letter, comes after it, will not connect to it, otherwise it will. --78.181.12.243 (talk) 09:12, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Name of this article

I doubt very much that the name of this article is useful to most readers of the Wikipedia. This should probably be merged within an article about Uighur writing systems in general, as it is a stub. -- Evertype·✆ 15:36, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

K̡ona Yezik̡

I think it's Kona Yezik̡ because now it is spelling as "Kona yéziq". K̡=q. --78.181.12.243 (talk) 09:08, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kasgarlimahmut.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Kasgarlimahmut.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests May 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Kasgarlimahmut.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:47, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Incomprehensible text

This addition by Verdy p is practically incomprehensible at all. The user either should explain what it does really mean and then it has to be rephrased, or it should be deleted.--Lüboslóv Yęzýkin (talk) 00:39, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Date of usage

PericlesofAthens, Hello, I just wanted to inform you that the Arabic alphabet used to write the Karluk language ancestral to modern Uyghur was used by the Muslim Kara-Khanid Khanate which existed side by side with the Buddhist Old Uyghur Kingdom of Qocho and Gansu Uyghur Kingdom which used the Old Uyghur alphabet to write the Old Uyghur language. The Muslim Chagatai Khanate later absorbed the Kingdom of Qocho and converted its inhabitants to Islam and linguistically "Karlukified" them. Its not correct to say that the Arabic alphabet was used subsequently (although the modern reformed one certainly was). If you look at Old Uyghur language and the modern Uyghur language, there are reliable sources explaining how they are two different languages from two different branches of the Turkic language family and the Old Uyghur langauge is not ancestral to modern Uyghur language.Rajmaan (talk) 19:10, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! Cool. Thanks for the explanation. Feel free to change my edit. Cheers. Pericles of Athens^Talk 19:13, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]