Jump to content

Talk:Utility tunnel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge proposed

[edit]

It has been suggested that Utilidor and Common utility duct be merged into this article. They are just minor variants of the same basic concept. The utilidor article is Start-class, but could easily just be a well-developed section here. Meanwhile, the CUD article is a stub no better than this one and could also be a section. With all three articles combined, this might make a pretty good article. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ Contribs. 18:56, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Utilidors tend to be mostly above-ground insulated structures in cold climates, usually too small to walk through. A utility tunnel is always below-grade and usually can be walked in, though it does seem Disney calls their tunnels "utilidors". I supose it could be one big article but the clamor for a merge seems decidedly muted. --Wtshymanski (talk) 14:02, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
For the record, the merges were done, resulting in a somewhat stronger article, probably no longer a stub. Reify-tech (talk) 14:06, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Utility tunnel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:15, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Utility tunnel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:54, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Utility_tunnel&oldid=1205878199"