Talk:Utah State Route 161/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi! I'll be reviewing this article, but I've got class in 15 minutes and I have to leave. Give me 2-3 hours and I should have the reviews up...at the MOST I'll have it up by tonight. Cheers, —the_ed17— 17:46, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
- I don't like the three red links in the template at the top. Could you put short histories of the three [Utah State Route 161 (1933-1935), Utah State Route 161 (1935-1953), and Utah State Route 161 (1961-1964)] in the 'History' section?
On hold for now; if you need help, just ask! —the_ed17— 22:47, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- Okay, it'll do. =) If any of those article are created, then add the {{seealso}} to the top. Cheers! —the_ed17— 00:14, 8 October 2008 (UTC)