Talk:Utah State Route 161
Appearance
Utah State Route 161 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Assessment
[edit]The route description and history sections are both too short for this to merit B-class. For example, the fact that SR-161 is a former alignment of US-91 is mentioned briefly in the lead, but not in the history section where it should be. -- Kéiryn (talk) 16:54, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]- This review is transcluded from Talk:Utah State Route 161/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Hi! I'll be reviewing this article, but I've got class in 15 minutes and I have to leave. Give me 2-3 hours and I should have the reviews up...at the MOST I'll have it up by tonight. Cheers, —the_ed17— 17:46, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
- I don't like the three red links in the template at the top. Could you put short histories of the three [Utah State Route 161 (1933-1935), Utah State Route 161 (1935-1953), and Utah State Route 161 (1961-1964)] in the 'History' section?
On hold for now; if you need help, just ask! —the_ed17— 22:47, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- Okay, it'll do. =) If any of those article are created, then add the {{seealso}} to the top. Cheers! —the_ed17— 00:14, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Engineering and technology good articles
- GA-Class U.S. state highway articles
- Low-importance U.S. state highway articles
- GA-Class Road transport articles
- Low-importance Road transport articles
- U.S. state highway articles
- GA-Class Utah road transport articles
- Low-importance Utah road transport articles
- Utah road transport articles
- GA-Class U.S. road transport articles
- Low-importance U.S. road transport articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs in Utah
- Wikipedia requested photographs of roads in Utah
- U.S. road transport articles
- GA-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- GA-Class Utah articles
- Low-importance Utah articles
- WikiProject Utah articles
- WikiProject United States articles