Talk:Usage share of BitTorrent clients

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Usage share of BitTorrent clients article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing: Software Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Mid-importance).

Internet High‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sources currently not used in article

2009

2008

--Otterathome (talk) 12:24, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TorrentFreak user survey Removal

Does anyone else feel that this has no place here? The results our obviously skewed and incorrect due to Vuse posting it on their site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zark424 (talk • contribs) 19:57, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rerated article class

I rerated this article as a stub. There is not a single reference listed. A B-class article is full of sources and this has none. After updating the article it can be reconsidered for a higher class. § Music Sorter § (talk) 04:35, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Steam survay

Steam survayed users installed software and came up witht these stats:

µTorrent 29.41%,BitTorrent 5.28%,Vuze(Azureus) 4.37%,BitComet 2.44%

Does anyone think they are relevant? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.32.59.247 (talk) 22:42, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nominate for merge

This article is hopelessly outdated, and hasn't seen any real activity in several years. I propose that it be merged with Comparison of BitTorrent clients, and have marked both pages to that effect. 65.158.81.126 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 07:03, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are there reliable sources for this kind of information?

I notice that several of the more popular bittorrent clients, according to this TorrentFreak list, don't have Wikipedia pages, so they aren't considered notable by Wikipedia. That seems to indicate a lack of reliable objective information about which clients are actually prevalent. Either that, or Wikipedia decisions on notability are not being made based on which clients are actually used. Normanmargolus (talk) 17:57, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]