Talk:Urtatagai conflict (1913)

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 August 2019. The result of the discussion was keep.

	Afghanistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Afghanistan, a project to maintain and expand Afghanistan-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AfghanistanWikipedia:WikiProject AfghanistanTemplate:WikiProject AfghanistanAfghanistan articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: National / Russian & Soviet

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	National militaries task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

Name

Isn't this more of a dispute than a conflict? Because it appears no shots were ever fired. THEREALhistoryandgames (talk) 02:36, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Please move your concerns here per WP:ONUS for such changes.

Your last edit summary: "What does this have to do with WP:ONUS? Obviously, adding a window "result" is not superfluous in this case. In this case, we don't need WP:RS to add such conclusions to the article, we have all the data to make them according to this . I will not add anything to the result window yet, but leave the window of territorial changes like this"

The result was that they came to an agreement, and Afghan forces withdrew from the island. @Dushnilkin Noorullah (talk) 01:09, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1: Why did you create a discussion when I'm not going to change anything?

2: Why did you just quote me without adding anything after?

3: Why did you write the outcome of this conflict anyway? What's the point of this?

4: WP:ONUS Initially, it is applicable to discussion topics by adding something, for example, some conflict to the list of wars, as here. The result window, although not necessary, but desirable, we can add a new section instead of the result and specify a link to it.

P.S. And again, I said I'm not going to change anything, stop spamming me with notifications and writing to the discussion page when I haven't even violated WP:3RR. Dushnilkin (talk) 06:02, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1. You initially changed the result of the page to “Russian victory”.

2. You said you weren’t going to add anything to the result window yet, implying you were going to again later.

3. Because WP:RS sources dictate such?

4. WP:ONUS is for you to prove something you’re adding to the page. The case was brought up for you trying to change the result to “Russian victory” with little explanation — and no sourcing.

You implied you were going to edit the page again, and you reverted the page numerous times (as did I for you), which is why I templated your page, not “spammed you”. Noorullah (talk) 08:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to do this later only taking into account the preliminary discussion on this page, if I want, I will create a separate part here where I tag you, and so you just polluted my discussion page with an unreasonable warning.

I am not going to discuss now whether it is necessary to include the "result" window in the page, if anything, I will add a separate page here if necessary, and so the conversation is over.

Dushnilkin (talk) 09:01, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]