Talk:Ursula and Sabina Eriksson/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: AGK [•] 22:21, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- Concisely written; flows well. Nice summary of all the events, leaving no "unanswered questions" (as is quite common with articles about events). I noticed a few punctuation irregularities when reviewing, which I fixed; I'm guessing that's just a small eccentricity of the writing of the primary author :P.
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Meets WP:V; no obvious factual errors. Cites a variety of reliable sourced.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Covers all aspects of the subject matter, in adequate depth.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Satisfies WP:NPOV.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No ongoing edit wars or substantial expansion of the article. Incident is not a current one.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- No images bar the map, but that is understandable. The map, by the by, is very nice, and adds a lot to the article overall.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Happy to grant this article GA status! AGK [•] 22:21, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: