Talk:Urif

Palestine Mid‑importance

	Palestine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

Yitzhar settlers on Urif land

Ok, there are so many films showing the Yitzhar settlers harassing the villagers of Urif (and other Palestinian villages), so I don't really understand why we are trying to hide this?

Does anyone think that the Yitzhar settlers come (in large numbers), always men only, (for rather: young boys) onto Palestinian village land: does anyone really assume that they have friendly purposes?? Seriously?? There are about 10 more WP:RS sources about the settler harassment for every one already in the article, I could of course add them, but that is not really what I’m here for....I would prefer to spend my time on say, Ottoman history.....Huldra (talk) 23:47, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you're right, but what aggravated them in the first place? I don't know. It's easy to point fingers, but we as editors must be circumspect, and look at both accounts of the story. For instance, the field that was set ablaze, the settlers deny any involvement. Yes, one Arab was killed in the ensuing trouble, but you'd have to examine closely the sources to understand what really happened there. Anyway, it is no secret that Arabs from Urif were arrested by the IDF after being caught with weapons.Davidbena (talk) 00:19, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making a mockery of our articles and policies. The Haaretz article says point blank "An Israeli settler shot and wounded a Palestinian man on Saturday in a clash that began when a group of settlers set fire to fields belonging to a Palestinian village in the occupied West Bank, officials said." You use the Jerusalem Post attributing to the Yitzhar spokesman a claim that the Palestinians set fire to their own fields, to water down that straightforward statement of fact to "there were conflicting accounts as to who set fire to the fields". That is a straightforward violation of WP:NPOV and WP:RS. nableezy - 21:18, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We should follow WP:BRD the edit was reverted and hence there should be discussion. --Shrike (talk) 14:57, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We should follow WP:RS and WP:NPOV and not revert things for hurting some nationalist pride. nableezy - 21:12, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]