Talk:Upper Gotvand Dam

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Upper Gotvand Dam article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Dams Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dams, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dams on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DamsWikipedia:WikiProject DamsTemplate:WikiProject DamsDam articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Iran Low‑importance

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Upper and lower?

I am having troubling figuring out the difference between the "upper" and "lower" Gotvand dams. Here and here indicates it is just one dam. There is mention in both of those sources of a extension to the power house. IWPCO also seems to refer to it as the "upper" here. The source currently in the article doesn't help much and I am inclined to believe there is just one dam. If so, this article should be redirected to Upper Gotvand Dam. If anyone can help differentiate, please do. Thanks.--NortyNort (Holla) 13:37, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Height

There are two different figures about the dam height–both provided by the company. This source says 180 m from foundation while this source says 182 m without specifying what kind of height it is. Beagel (talk) 22:48, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, from the same source too. I tend to lean towards the technical information (first) source; I think there is less room for error. I could see a mistake being made easier in a news report (maybe someone working in a separate office or bad translation). I have seen this confliction before and stick with the owner's main page for the project. This is confusing, it is often hard to find a consistent height for large dams.--NortyNort (Holla) 03:32, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

راه حلي مناسب تر از تخريب

اينجانب متخصص عمران هستم و راه حلي كه به نظر مي رسد كاهش ارتفاع ابگيري وايجاد تدريجي حائل آب گيري درياچه به سمت كوههاي حاوي معدن نمك مي باشد.به نحوي كه با ايجاد سپر يا سد فرعي مي توان به اين نتيجه دست يافت ،راه حلي كه به تخريب سد منجر نمي گردد. فعلا ارتفاع آبگيري سد را با رها سازي آب به حدي برسانيم كه درياچه فروكش كرده به كوه نمك نرسد. اكبر محمدزاده akbarmohammadzade@yahoo.com'78.38.28.3 (talk) 05:39, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

suitable solution for salt increase problem

 I am Iranian civil engineer and want to give any solution for salt

increase problem of avoiding salt increase of behind dam water . akbarmohammadzade@yahoo.com78.38.28.3 (talk) 05:52, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]