Talk:Upper Brook Street Chapel, Manchester

Upper Brook Street Chapel, Manchester has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 2, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 21, 2008.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that the Upper Brook Street Chapel in Manchester, designed by Sir Charles Barry shortly before he designed the Palace of Westminster, is said to be the first neogothic Nonconformist chapel?

Christianity: Baptist Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Baptist work group.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Greater Manchester Mid‑importance

	Greater Manchester portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Islam Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

John Trevor & Labour church

According to The Labour Church this happened in 1891, so it's not a few years later
The Stanley Pierson reference is inadmissible, as JSTOR is restricted-access

Jotel (talk) 08:58, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're right with the first point; my mistake. Thanks for fixing it.
A lot of journal articles are restricted (or have no) access online. That doesn't mean that you can't access them, but you may have to take a trip to the library to see them rather than just clicking on a link. I'm pretty sure that a journal article meets the definition of a reliable source. I'm far more worried about the random webpages that I've referenced than that...

Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 09:17, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I have no problem with the journal article as such. But if it's not accessible online, I'd give just the journal name, volume, year, page number(s), as one would do with a book. A link implies the full contents is available behind the link. Jotel (talk) 09:26, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the journal article ref back. I've left the link in it because it is useful to some people (e.g. me). Mike Peel (talk) 19:20, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly useful sources

This one seems to imply that Unitarians used this church until at least 1916
More waffle from the city council, see section CC/06/13. In particular: Delete from "This Council regrets…" to the end
--Jotel (talk) 17:49, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've now added the info from the references. It's a bit depressing that all the council is doing about the building is correcting how it is included in the meeting minutes. :-/ Thanks for the links. Mike Peel (talk) 20:14, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Passed

This article has passed the GA noms. Further suggestions for improvements would be to expand the article to reflect this structures current usage, and architectural significance. If you feel that this review is in error feel free to take it to WP:GA/R. Thanks. Tarret ^talk 20:09, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article name

Why is the article name simply Upper Brook Street Chapel?...Seth Whales (talk) 14:50, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think it should be? Mike Peel (talk) 16:54, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Upper Brook Street Chapel, Manchester. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.unitariansocieties.org.uk/historical/ministerobit.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:22, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]