Talk:Unsepttrium

Elements Low‑importance

	Chemistry portal This redirect is supported by WikiProject Elements, which gives a central approach to the chemical elements and their isotopes on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing this redirect, or visit the project page for more details.ElementsWikipedia:WikiProject ElementsTemplate:WikiProject Elementschemical elements articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

‹See TfM›

Physics

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles

Page

Does anyone think that this page should not be a redirect, but be a content page? Unsepttrium is a very significant element, as it is the last neutral element physically possible, and any elements after it could only exist as ions. Yankeesrule3 (talk) 04:29, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, since it is supposedly the limit for a neutral atom, the last chemical element possible. (though not the last nuclear physics element). 70.24.251.208 (talk) 07:51, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you keep making this article into a redirect for no apparent reason?

My edits restoring the content to this article have been reverted twice. No reason has been given, other than a discussion at WT:ELEM which has barely even started. An editor there redirected the article without any discussion - a clear violation of WP:POINT. Such elements as unbioctium, untriseptium, unpentpentium, and unsepttrium - especially untriseptium and unsepttrium - are clearly notable, having been thought by reliable sources at various points in time to be the end of the periodic table. Why are these editors making a WP:POINTY removal of content? Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty | Averted crashes} 20:31, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's quite a common thing or a project, when a person suggests stuff and when it isn't objected, it is done if the person suggested the thing still wants to. It just happens, nobody's usually against that-- so everyone's OK. Right or not, it works this way.

Clearly notable-- don't think so. They're just an opportunity of where it may end. They are nothing to write without this info. Hear you scream, "but it is a point!" Not really. It doesn't take much to be an end-- it is a thing simply determined by its Z. No experiments, nothing in relation-- just that stuff. Since it is the only one to think of, you could better have a nice discussion on where it ends. 137 is just a number coming from an equation. Period. That's it. Is it worth it to have an article when you copy all of the stuff in another one, which has some other info? Don't think so. If you want to make it useful, do some cleanup for the current discussion, collect it all-in-one and get details. Everyone will love it. You risk to get a barnstar if you make it to GA (say).--R8R Gtrs (talk) 12:07, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]