Talk:Unleashed (Fringe)

Unleashed (Fringe) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 26, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 24, 2011.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that actor Kirk Acevedo suggested his real-life wife play his character's spouse in the Fringe episode "Unleashed"?

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Unleashed (Fringe)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Matthew RD 18:30, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, I shall be reviewing the article. Since I kind of futzed up the review of There's More Than One of Everything because of lousy internet connection, I will look through this a little more thoroughly. Also, let's thank the Fringe gods for giving us a fourth season :) -- Matthew RD 18:30, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is how the article fares against the GA criteria;

Well written: See notes below
Factually accurate and verifiable: No dead links, see notes below
Broad in coverage: Passed
Neutral: Passed
Stable: No edit wars, Passed
Images: Both check out fine, Passed

Here are a few irks;

I have found three dablinks.
This whole source quote thing, here are the sentences that need to end in a reference, even if it appear later in the paragraph;
- "He fights for his life throughout the episode." end with [1]
- "sort of an amalgam of a bat, lion, and a dragon." end with [4]
- "action hero moment." end with [4]
"Their efforts on the episode were ultimately nominated in several categories at the Golden Reel Awards, and at the HPA Awards, for which they won." ended without a source, since it is repeated again in the awards section, than add one of those sources that are most relevant ([11]).
"which is the idea that you can have organisms with genes from other species." that sentence sounds like "you can try this at home, kids!" :) I feel uncomfortable with the word you, maybe replace it with something else, or reword sentence. Example; "which is an idea that organisms can be created by using genes from seperate species."
"Murray concluded that "Unleashed" stays at the level of a well-shot, disappointingly straightforward monster movie, with an everything’s-okay-now ending". where did the quote begin? You added the end quote mark, but not the start, unless it was at "Unleashed".
You mentioned in the awards section about episodes of Lost, CSI, House and True Blood, why not add the names of the episodes if they're available?

I will place it on hold until the issues are addressed. Thanks. -- Matthew RD 23:08, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I made all the changes you asked for. Oh, and you're last GA review was perfectly fine! The particular user who decided to reassess it had no idea what she was talking about (and her comments were, quite frankly, a waste of everyone's time). Thanks for this review! :) Ruby2010 talk 03:17, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your words of encouragement, and dealing with the issues. I will pass it. Good work. -- Matthew RD 03:28, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, and thanks :) Ruby2010 talk 17:54, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]