Talk:Unknown known

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles

Philosophy: Epistemology Low‑importance

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Epistemology

Deletion

This page reads as a vanity stub, original research. It cites one author, and primarily a seemingly private website. Moreover, the tone and style are not appropriate for wikipedia. Recommending for speedy deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Naysayer (talk • contribs) 23:47, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that there is a degree of vanity publishing involved. Nonetheless, the topic itself is more than suitable for an entry. This article is better than nothing, so please do not delete. A re-write would be a much better approach. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.208.46.92 (talk) 23:47, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge?

This article seems to depend on There are known knowns. It seems to me that it would work well as a section of that article. BayShrimp (talk) 21:43, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]