Talk:Universitas lingvarum Litvaniae

Lithuania Mid‑importance

	Lithuania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lithuania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LithuaniaWikipedia:WikiProject LithuaniaTemplate:WikiProject LithuaniaLithuania articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Image of book

Hi, the history of printing types is a hobby of mine. The original image did not at all look like a book printed in 1737, it seemed to use Didone type in the style introduced at the start of the nineteenth century. I wonder if one of the reprints could have reprinted the original title page as an internal page. Searching on Commons I found the image I've substituted it with, which I believe to be authentically the original book. You'll see it has the rougher style of printing and Dutch taste fonts of the early eighteenth century. Blythwood (talk) 10:58, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Blythwood: The initial image of the book was taken from an article of the Universal Lithuanian Encyclopedia which claim that it dates to 1737. However, I found nearly identical title page at the Vilnius University Library (also from 1737) with which you replaced the initial image (see: HERE, page 7). So maybe the initial image of the book really is a later reprint of the original 1737 book, thus probably you are right and the image you inserted should be kept for the sake of Wikipedia:Verifiability. -- Pofka (talk) 13:02, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]