Talk:United Online

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Internet

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

California: Los Angeles

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force.

Notability Concerns

Is this company notable? The companies it owns maybe; but is there anything to show that this company in itself is notable? I'm minded to nominate this under afd; but I'd be grateful if anybody could provide any sources to satisfy my concerns before I do this. B1atv 06:56, 16 October 2007 (UTC).[reply]

COMMENT —Preceding unsigned comment added by AmpleTech (talk • contribs) 08:12, 27 February 2009 (UTC) This company is notable in its relations to other businesses, especially if linked to ethical questions as mentioned at classmates.com and Names Database. Society require knowledge about large corporations and the skeletons they may keep in their closets, not merely to discredit such corporations, but to learn more about its true character. Given the present financial situation and the events leading to it, I am sure that society would like to learn more about things hidden behind a Logo or Brand Name to give them the option to make informed decisions on where they want to spend or invest their money (Also see The Corporation).[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.untd.com/companyinfo/about.html http://sitemapzone.blogspot.com/2009/06/classmatescom.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. NortyNort (Holla) 11:48, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Opinion of Ex Employees" Relevance

The section titled "Opinion of Ex Employees" seems inappropriate and irrelevant to the Wikipedia entry. I have not seen anything similar in use for other articles - It is not credible (Glassdoor opinions are not a credible reference source) and appears to be disgruntled ex-employee(s) who are venting. I suggest deleting this section Cryptodd (talk) 00:32, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]